Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 6 October 2011

Strategy Execution: An Empirical Analysis of Obstacles Faced by Master of Business Administration Executive Students

Ayande Alpha1 & Sabourin Vincent1

American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp. 511–524 · doi.org/10.3844/ajebasp.2011.511.524

7,729 accesses4,874 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Problem statement: This study examines obstacles faced by MBA executive students, regarding five dimensions of obstacle management. The purpose of the research is to assess the relative importance of these dimensions and to establish empirical linkages among obstacles and factors such as overall perception of the organization in terms of obstacle management, span of control of the best management practices, age and success, in order to better understand the influence of those obstacles in light of organizational strategy execution. Approach: A survey questionnaire was administered to 512 managers to study the five pre-defined dimensions regarding obstacles in strategy execution faced by MBA executive students. We used Principal Component Analysis and then ANOVA analysis to examine the empirical linkages between the dimensions of strategy execution identified in previous research and socio-demographic variables such as age, span of control, success, tenure and experience. Results: We found that the dimensions that came first in order of importance, were the obstacles related to emotions, followed by the immediate action, integrity, initiatives and finally the obstacles related to rules. This study also found a linkage between the Emotions dimension (getting a commitment for your objectives) and the variable Eval1 (How would you score your organization in terms of managing the five obstacle dimensions?) and Eval2 (What would be the score of your organization if the management of the 25 (Obstacles) practices had been mastered?) Moreover, our results reveal a connection between the immediate action dimension and Eval2. The integrity dimension highlighted the linkage with the Eval1. We showed the tie-ins between the initiatives dimension and the Eval2. The rules dimension reveals three linkages with the socio-demographic variables such as age, Eval1 and Eval3 (I believe that my success in work-related activities is often a matter of luck). We also found that the younger the MBA executive students were, the more their perception of obstacles related to the rules dimension was important. This research found many connections between the five dimensions regarding obstacles in organizational strategy execution. The set of obstacles faced by MBA executive students did not register the same impact according to strategy execution. However, additional work is necessary in order to generalize our findings. Conclusion: This study proves a contribution by identifying a set of specific obstacles for each facet of strategy execution faced by MBA executive students in the execution of their organizational objectives.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2011 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Alpha, A. & Vincent, S. (2011). Strategy Execution: An Empirical Analysis of Obstacles Faced by Master of Business Administration Executive Students. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajebasp.2011.511.524

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 3, Issue 3
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Strategy Execution: An Empirical Analysis of Obstacles Faced by Master of Business Administration Executive StudentsAmerican Journal of Economics and Business Administration · Volume 3, Issue 3 · pp. 511–524 · © Science PublicationsDownload