Sign inSubmit
ArticleArticle metrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 15 September 2011

Knowledge Management Capabilities Rubrics

Azizah bt Abdul Rahman1 & Sara Hassani1

American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp. 439–443 · doi.org/10.3844/ajebasp.2011.439.443

7,314 accesses8,172 downloads1 citations (Crossref)Journal metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Problem statement: Recently researchers discerned the vitality and importance of Knowledge Management Capabilities (KMC) evaluation in organizations. In fact evaluation of KMC helps to prevent failure in Knowledge Management (KM) projects. Approach: One of the most popular methods in the phase of evaluating KMC is Fuzzy method which evaluates seven attributes of KMC. Fuzzy needs KM experts to give their opinion about these attributes as input data. However in some organizations these experts are not available. Results: Therefore in this study a rubric matrix is developed as an assessment tool with ordered rank (very high, medium and very low) of descriptive characteristics of criteria (seven attributes) that organizations wish to evaluate. Conclusion: This rubric is applicable for members of an organization which are not familiar completely with KMC and also will be maintained by analyzing and surveying many different researches.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2011 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Rahman, A. B. A. & Hassani, S. (2011). Knowledge Management Capabilities Rubrics. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(3), 439–443. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajebasp.2011.439.443

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 3, Issue 3
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Knowledge Management Capabilities RubricsAmerican Journal of Economics and Business Administration · Volume 3, Issue 3 · pp. 439–443 · © Science PublicationsDownload