Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 20 December 2025

Comparative Analysis of Laboratory Measured and PVTP Software Data

Oluwasanmi Samuel Teniola1 & Mercy Isaiah Okegbemi2

American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp. 98–106 · doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2025.98.106

2,761 accesses1,458 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Cubic Equations of State (EOS), including the Peng-Robinson (PR) and Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK) models, are foundational in petroleum engineering for modeling the thermodynamic behavior of hydrocarbon systems. These EOS are widely used to predict phase behavior and Pressure-Volume-Temperature (PVT) properties, which are crucial for reservoir simulation, production forecasting, and enhanced oil recovery. However, their predictive accuracy diminishes when applied to complex fluids under High-Pressure, High-Temperature (HPHT) conditions or in the presence of heavy components. This study aims to evaluate the predictive performance of the PR and SRK EOS using PVTP software by comparing their simulation results with laboratory-measured PVT data from Nigerian crude oil samples. Key reservoir conditions, such as temperature, pressure, and fluid composition, were maintained consistently to ensure a reliable comparison. Simulations were conducted for key properties including bubble point pressure, oil formation volume factor (Bo), Gas-Oil Ratio (GOR), gas formation volume factor (Bg), and viscosity. Results show both EOS models performed adequately in predicting bubble point pressure, Bo, and GOR, especially near saturation conditions. However, significant deviations were observed in viscosity and Bg predictions, particularly at low pressures. In conclusion, while PVTP software provides reasonable estimates for most volumetric properties, its predictions for gas-phase parameters require further refinement for complex fluid systems.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Teniola, O. S. & Okegbemi, M. I. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Laboratory Measured and PVTP Software Data. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 18(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2025.98.106

Licence
CC BY 4.0
Issue
Volume 18, Issue 1
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Comparative Analysis of Laboratory Measured and PVTP Software DataAmerican Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences · Volume 18, Issue 1 · pp. 98–106 · CC BY 4.0Download