Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 24 April 2021

Effects of Architectural Irregularities on the Seismic Behavior of Buildings

Sara Mostafa Karra1, Iman Hajal2, Youmn Al Rawi3 & Aya Diab1

American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp. 162–176 · doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2021.162.176

6,779 accesses3,934 downloads2 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Cooperation between the architect and the civil engineer has nowadays become essential in any project for the client’s requests’ sake. This study was made to show this idea’s importance and beneficial consequences. For this purpose, a 40-story dual-system high-rise building has been designed to resist moderate seismic and high wind loads. Three main models were formed: Starting with the net model, which is the regular model, followed by the mass irregularity models that were generated for the luxury floor desires (this irregularity was placed in two different locations, namely at the top and middle position), ending with the soft story irregularity models that were cited in the building’s middle and bottom for the gym floor’s need. The positions for each irregularity were tested and compared to those of the regular model under the effect of seismic load on one hand and under the influence of three different wind loads on the other. The required wind loads studied in this article were assigned from the wind speeds of 80, 100 and 120 mph. For these models’ analysis, RSA using finite element method on ETABS was used.The results exhibited that the peak wind speed this building held was 110 mph for both irregularities. Furthermore, the seismically-designed high-rise buildings might not be safe enough to resist a wind load speed of 120 mph. In addition, the middle location is the most preferable locus for these irregularities to occur regarding wind and seismic loads because of its minor displacement, drift and base shear. Besides, it ensured the economic cost of the mass irregularity ($1,706,380), which is in turn less than that of the top position ($1,790,187). The same applies for the stiffness irregularity cost, requiring a budget of $1,632,310 in the middle position but an expense of $1,676,368 for the bottom locus. Although the irregularity’s perfect location seemed unfamiliar, it pursues the sake of the client, the architect and the civil engineer alike.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Karra, S. M., Hajal, I., Al Rawi, Y. & Diab, A. (2021). Effects of Architectural Irregularities on the Seismic Behavior of Buildings. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2021.162.176

Licence
CC BY 4.0
Issue
Volume 14, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Effects of Architectural Irregularities on the Seismic Behavior of BuildingsAmerican Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences · Volume 14, Issue 2 · pp. 162–176 · CC BY 4.0Download