Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Case Report · Open access · Published 16 January 2018

Simulation of Stone Column Ground Improvement (Comparison between Axisymmetric and Plane Strain)

Maryam Gaber1, Anuar Kasa1, Norinah Abdul-Rahman1 & Jamal Alsharef1

American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp. 129–137 · doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2018.129.137

8,152 accesses9,349 downloads4 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Most of the numerical studies on stone columns are based on the unit cell concept. However, the impact of interactions between adjacent columns and between the columns and the surrounding soil has not been investigated thoroughly. In this study, the finite element software, PLAXIS-2D-V8.2, was used to simulate a stone column as a unit cell and as a plane strain model in order to specify the difference between the performances of each model. The key factors that were investigated included the diameter and c/c spacing of the stone columns, friction angle of the stone column material and undrained cohesion of the soft soil. The emphasis of this parametric study was on the settlement improvement factor and excess pore water pressure, since these are critical to the design of stone columns. The main findings of this study were that in the plane strain model, the settlement improvement factor ranged between 2.2 and 3.2, which means that the settlement was improved more than twice. Meanwhile, in the unit cell concept, the settlement improvement factor did not exceed 1.53. The results of the settlement improvement were compared with the theoretical solutions that are commonly used for studies into the behaviour of stone columns. The unit cell model showed a lower peak value of excess pore water pressure than the plane strain model.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Gaber, M., Kasa, A., Abdul-Rahman, N. & Alsharef, J. (2018). Simulation of Stone Column Ground Improvement (Comparison between Axisymmetric and Plane Strain). American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(1), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2018.129.137

Licence
CC BY 3.0
Issue
Volume 11, Issue 1
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Simulation of Stone Column Ground Improvement (Comparison between Axisymmetric and Plane Strain)American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences · Volume 11, Issue 1 · pp. 129–137 · CC BY 3.0Download