Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 10 November 2017

Comparative Analysis of Skid Resistance for Different Roadway Surface Treatments

Osama A. Abaza1, Tanay Datta Chowdhury1 & Mahmoud Arafat1

American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp. 890–899 · doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2017.890.899

8,136 accesses6,807 downloads14 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Pavement skid resistance impacts road functionality and can affect user safety and vehicle operation costs. This study was an investigation of the effect of sealcoats on skid resistance. Seven different sealcoats-fog seal, chip seal, slurry seal, sand seal, high-friction seal, cape seal, and glass seal-were lab and field tested. Laboratory samples were further tested in the field on pavement sections. To validate lab and field tests, high-friction seal was tested on recently placed pavement sections in Anchorage, Alaska. The British Pendulum tester was used to measure sealcoat skid resistance. A minimum of 40 randomized readings from the lab and field were sorted. Statistical analysis of lab and field data showed insignificant differences between all sealcoat types with the exception of cape seal. The mean skid resistance of sealcoats indicated a preference for high-friction and glass seals. On average, high-friction and glass seals had skid numbers close to 40, providing effective skid resistance as well as safer riding quality. The field and lab data of high-friction sealcoat were validated on recently paved roads in Anchorage. The results highlighted the consistency of skid resistance measurements for the three types of testing conditions (lab, field, and real roadway) for high-friction sealcoat.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Abaza, O. A., Chowdhury, T. D. & Arafat, M. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Skid Resistance for Different Roadway Surface Treatments. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 10(4), 890–899. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2017.890.899

Licence
CC BY 3.0
Issue
Volume 10, Issue 4
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Comparative Analysis of Skid Resistance for Different Roadway Surface TreatmentsAmerican Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences · Volume 10, Issue 4 · pp. 890–899 · CC BY 3.0Download