Low Power Multiplier by Effective Capacitance Reduction
Nageshwar Reddy Peddamgari1 & Damu Radhakrishnan2 Show affiliations
- Design Verification, India
- State University of New York, United States
American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 126–133 · doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2017.126.133
Abstract
In this study we present an energy efficient multiplier design based on effective capacitance minimization. Only the partial product reduction stage in the multiplier is considered in this research. The effective capacitance at a node is defined as the product of capacitance and switching activity at that node. Hence to minimize the effective capacitance, we decided to ensure that the switching activity of nodes with higher capacitance is kept to a minimum. This is achieved by wiring the higher switching activity signals to nodes with lower capacitance and vice versa, for the 4:2 compressor and adder cells. This reduced the overall switching capacitance, thereby reducing the total power consumption of the multiplier. Power analysis was done by synthesizing our design on Spartan-3E FPGA. The dynamic power for our 1616 multiplier was measured as 360.74 mW and the total power 443.31 mW. This is 17.4% less compared to the most recent design. Also, we noticed that our design has the lowest power-delay product compared to the multipliers presented in literature.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Peddamgari, N. R. & Radhakrishnan, D. (2017). Low Power Multiplier by Effective Capacitance Reduction. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 10(1), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2017.126.133
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 10, Issue 1
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
