Effect of the Maximum Density Ratio Between Liquid and Vapor on Cavitating Simulation
Guangjian Zhang1, Weidong Shi1, Ling Zhou1 & Desheng Zhang1 Show affiliations
- Jiangsu University, China
American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp. 119–126 · doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2015.119.126
Abstract
The Filter-Based Model (FBM), which was built into CFX through CFX Expression Language (CEL) and a homogeneous cavitation model were employed to simulate cavitating flow around a 2D Clark-y hydrofoil. The effect of a maximum density ratio between liquid and vapor on sheet and cloud cavitating simulation was investigated. The results show that the maximum density ratio has a significant impact on cavitating simulation. The predicted cavitation with default value 1000 is underestimated compared with experiment. With the increasing of maximum density ratio, the interaction interface between liquid and vapor becomes unstable, accompanying the intermittent shedding of small-scale cavities. The cavity length and vapor volume fraction also increase. When the maximum density is increased to some degree, its effect on cavitation flow calculation becomes unobvious. A smaller maximum density ratio can ensure numerical stability but the result predicted with true density ratio is more accurate, so 20000 is recommended as the value of maximum density ratio in cavitation model to reach an optimum between accuracy and convergence.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Zhang, G., Shi, W., Zhou, L. & Zhang, D. (2015). Effect of the Maximum Density Ratio Between Liquid and Vapor on Cavitating Simulation. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 8(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2015.119.126
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 8, Issue 1
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
