Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 28 August 2013

Comparison of Bet and Water Adsorption Techniques

B. H. Diya’uddeen1, I. A. Mohammed2, B. Y. Jibril3 & I. M. Bugaje1

American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp. 282–285 · doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2013.282.285

7,246 accesses5,824 downloads5 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

The effect of activated carbon surface area on the amount of fluid adsorbed is significant. Thus, the surface area of an adsorbent is an important factor. The use of the costly BET measurement method is the standard. However, water adsorption method was proposed as an alternate method. Nevertheless, results presented were for activated carbon prepared and surface areas reported were based on BET literature values. In this study, chemically activated carbons were produced from corn cobs by impregnation using 25 wt% CaCl2 as activating agent. Surface area of the activated carbons was then determined using both BET technique and water adsorption techniques by determining the volume at monolayer coverage. Comparison between the results of surface areas obtained from the two techniques was performed. From the present experimental investigations, water adsorption technique showed a wide range of deviation with increase in surface area of adsorbent. It was established from the analyses that water adsorption technique approximate the BET technique reasonably well for surface areas below 200 m2 g-1, above this value results from water adsorption technique are not reliable.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Diya’uddeen, B. H., Mohammed, I. A., Jibril, B. Y. & Bugaje, I. M. (2013). Comparison of Bet and Water Adsorption Techniques. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 6(3), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2013.282.285

Licence
CC BY 3.0
Issue
Volume 6, Issue 3
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Comparison of Bet and Water Adsorption TechniquesAmerican Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences · Volume 6, Issue 3 · pp. 282–285 · CC BY 3.0Download