Detection of Subsurface Defects in Concrete Bridge Deck Joints
Wonchang Choi1, Larry Rickard2, Taher Abu-Lebdeh1 & Miguel Picornell1 Show affiliations
- North Carolina A and T State University, United States
- North Carolina, Greensboro, United States
American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp. 440–447 · doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2011.440.447
Abstract
Problem statement: The integrity of deck joints in highway bridges plays a major role to determine overall performance of bridge system. As the bridge maintenance program, the defects in deck joints have historically been detected by conventional non-destructive testing and evaluation methods such as visual inspection, chain-dragging and by the detecting sounds under the traffic. Future bridge maintenance challenges will demand the development of techniques and procedures to detect and monitor such defects before they become apparent. Approach: Two non-destructive methods; namely Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) and Seismic Properties Analyzer (SPA) were employed to assess the integrity of deck joins installed in North Carolina bridges. Results: The results obtained with the GPR and SPA allows to quantify the subsurface defects in bridge deck joints. Conclusion: The practical application and limitations of each method are discussed in this study.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Choi, W., Rickard, L., Abu-Lebdeh, T. & Picornell, M. (2011). Detection of Subsurface Defects in Concrete Bridge Deck Joints. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4(4), 440–447. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2011.440.447
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 4, Issue 4
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
