Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 30 September 2026

Effects of Wheat Bran, EM Bacteria, Ammonium Nitrate and Fungal Additives on Fermentation and Forage Quality of Rice Straw Silage

Bin Yang1, Jiahuan Liu2, Dongmei Ma2, Lingyu Li2,3, Rundong Qin2, Junhao Li2 & Lie Yang2

American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp. 35–1 · doi.org/10.3844/ajbbsp.2026.22.03.035

642 accesses335 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

The global ruminant industry is constrained by a persistent shortage of high-quality roughage, thus rendering the bioconversion of agricultural residues, such as rice straw, a critical priority. Nevertheless, the high lignification, silicification, and nitrogen deficiency of rice straw pose significant biological barriers to traditional ensiling. This study investigated the impact of various additives on rice straw silage quality. Six treatments were evaluated: CK (control, no additives), L1 (200 g/kg wheat bran), L2 (L1 + 1 g/kg EM bacteria), L3 (L2 + 20 g/kg ammonium nitrate), L4 (L3 + 1 g/kg Aspergillus oryzae), and L5 (L4 + 1 g/kg Trichoderma longibrachiatum). All additive concentrations are expressed on a fresh matter basis. After 45 days of ensiling, all treatments significantly improved silage quality compared to the control. Treatments L2-L5 achieved significantly higher sensory scores than CK (P<0.05). All treatments significantly improved silage quality compared to the control, with increased crude protein content, decreased fiber fractions (ADF, NDF), and enhanced Relative Feed Value (RFV) (P<0.05). Fermentation parameters also improved, as evidenced by lower pH values and higher lactic acid concentrations (P<0.05). Results indicate that optimal silage enhancement requires the combined supplementation of fermentable carbohydrates (wheat bran), EM bacteria, and nitrogen source (ammonium nitrate). The addition of A. oryzae further improved silage quality, while the effects of T. longibrachiatum were less conclusive. Treatment L4 achieved the highest Relative Feed Value (RFV: 79.86) and optimal fermentation profile, while L5 showed comparable pH and lactic acid levels but lower RFV (79.29) and acetic acid content. Based on the current experimental conditions, T. longibrachiatum did not provide additional benefits beyond L4 and is not recommended for rice straw silage under these conditions. Overall, treatment L4 produced the most favorable improvements in rice straw silage quality.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, B., Liu, J., Ma, D., Li, L., Qin, R., Li, J. & Yang, L. (2026). Effects of Wheat Bran, EM Bacteria, Ammonium Nitrate and Fungal Additives on Fermentation and Forage Quality of Rice Straw Silage. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 22(3), 35–1. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajbbsp.2026.22.03.035

Licence
CC BY 4.0
Issue
Volume 22, Issue 3
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Effects of Wheat Bran, EM Bacteria, Ammonium Nitrate and Fungal Additives on Fermentation and Forage Quality of Rice Straw SilageAmerican Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology · Volume 22, Issue 3 · pp. 35–1 · CC BY 4.0Download