Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 8 February 2026

Investigating Campylobacter Spp. in Mekong Delta Duck Farms: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Antibiotic Resistance

Nguyen Vu Thuy Hong Loan1, Le Trung Kien2, Do Ngoc Yen Phuong1, Lam Thi Ngoc Trang1, Le Minh Thanh2 & Nguyen Trong Ngu2

American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp. 315–327 · doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2025.315.327

1,615 accesses1,118 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Campylobacter spp. is a leading cause of gastroenteritis worldwide, contributing to significant health and economic burdens, especially in poor hygiene practices. Investigating this bacterium's prevalence and antibiotic resistance in ducks from the Mekong Delta is essential, as the region's extensive duck farming industry presents a potential risk for transmission to humans through the food chain. During August 2024 to February 2025, this study surveyed 15 households and collected 324 samples (78 wastewaters, 78 environmental/fecal, and 168 cloacal swabs) across three provinces (Soc Trang, Hau Giang, and Tien Giang) in the Mekong Delta to assess Campylobacter spp. prevalence. A questionnaire was collected to analyze risk factors, employing a combination of multiple correspondence analysis and logistic regression models to identify key determinants of Campylobacter spp. infection. The sample was cultured in nutrient broth medium for 24 hours to enhance proliferation before using the PCR method to detect Campylobacter spp. and identify associated antibiotic resistance genes. Campylobacter spp. was detected in 50.31% of 324 samples from Hau Giang, Soc Trang, and Tien Giang, with Tien Giang having the highest prevalence at 82.00% (n = 82), indicating significant regional variation (p<0.001). Sample type (environmental/fecal, cloacal swabs, or wastewater) showed no significant differences. Logistic regression identified Tien Giang as a significant risk factor for Campylobacter infection (OR = 16.3, p<0.001). Demographic and practice factors were not significantly associated. The tetO gene was the most prevalent (84.42%, n = 130), with Hau Giang showing the highest resistance rates. Environmental/fecal samples had the highest prevalence of resistance genes like tetO (93.18%, n = 41) and cmeB (54.55%, n = 24), highlighting the farm environment's role in spreading antibiotic resistance in the Mekong Delta. The results highlight the importance of focusing targeted biosecurity measures on high-risk areas. The detection of the highest rates of antibiotic-resistance genes in environmental fecal samples suggests that this could be a significant reservoir. This underscores the need for antibiotic stewardship and improved sanitation practices on farms.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Hong Loan, N. V. T., Kien, L. T., Phuong, D. N. Y., Trang, L. T. N., Thanh, L. M. & Ngu, N. T. (2025). Investigating Campylobacter Spp. in Mekong Delta Duck Farms: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Antibiotic Resistance. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 20(4), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2025.315.327

Licence
CC BY 4.0
Issue
Volume 20, Issue 4
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Investigating Campylobacter Spp. in Mekong Delta Duck Farms: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Antibiotic ResistanceAmerican Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences · Volume 20, Issue 4 · pp. 315–327 · CC BY 4.0Download