Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 12 February 2024

In Sacco and in vitro Evaluation of Heating and Formaldehyde Treated Protein Feed

Annisa Rosmalia1, Idat Galih Permana2, Despal2 & Toto Toharmat2

American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp. 74–85 · doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2024.74.85

6,253 accesses3,608 downloads2 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Massive protein conversion into ammonia in the Rumen (RDP) should be avoided to prevent protein quality deterioration. Heating and formaldehyde treatments are commonly used to decrease Rumen-Degradable Protein (RDP), but it rarely used to protect local feed. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of heating and formaldehyde treatments in decreasing the RDP of local feed. The use of fistulated cattle, treatments, and procedures used in this study have been ethically cleared by the animal ethics committee, at IPB University. This study used a 5×3 factorial randomized block design with three replications with a sample size was 45. We used two factors; the 1st was high RDP feeds (TD = Tempe Dregs, BW = Brewery Waste, NSM = Nigella sativa Meal, SS = Soybean Seeds, CGF = Corn Gluten Feed) and the 2nd was treatment methods (unprotected, heating and formaldehyde). Ruminal degradation was determined using in sacco method. Three cannulated Frisian Holstein Bulls were fed twice daily with Elephant grass and concentrate at a ratio of 60:40 (DM basis). In vitro digestibility was evaluated using two two-stage Tilley and Terry in vitro methods. Parameters observed include nutrient content, in sacco degradation and ruminal degradation kinetics of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein (DM, OM, and CP), and in vitro digestibility. The results showed that protecting protein changed the nutrient content of feeds (1-6%). The DM and OM disappearance had the same pattern. The effective degradation of DM, OM, and CP significantly (p<0.05) decreased up to 17 and 27% in heating and formaldehyde treatments, respectively, compared to unprotected. Heating did not significantly affect the in vitro digestibility. Formaldehyde treatment had the lowest DM, OM, and CP in vitro digestibility (51.39, 74.25, and 45.90%). Heating treatment was effective in reducing the RDP of feed without interfering with feed digestibility.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Rosmalia, A., Permana, I. G., Despal, & Toharmat, T. (2024). In Sacco and in vitro Evaluation of Heating and Formaldehyde Treated Protein Feed. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 19(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2024.74.85

Licence
CC BY 4.0
Issue
Volume 19, Issue 1
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
In Sacco and in vitro Evaluation of Heating and Formaldehyde Treated Protein FeedAmerican Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences · Volume 19, Issue 1 · pp. 74–85 · CC BY 4.0Download