Relationship between Volumetric Water Footprint with Carcass and Meat Quality Characteristics Under Intensive Beef Cattle Production in South Africa
Tinny Noluthando Macamba1, Takalani Judas Mpofu1, Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe1, Cuthbert Baldwin Banga1,2, Ayanda Mavis Ngxumeshe1, Moses Motshekwe Ratsaka1, Karen Munhuweyi3 & Bohani Mtileni1 Show affiliations
- Department of Animal Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Animal Science and Production, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gaborone, Botswana
- Department of Animal Production, Agricultural Research Council, Irene, South Africa
American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp. 315–328 · doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2024.315.328
Abstract
As water accessibility becomes more challenging due to the increasing human population and agricultural competition, it is crucial to select beef cattle with optimal water efficiency. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between volumetric water footprint with carcass and meat quality of beef cattle under an intensive production system. Thirty-three (33) beef cattle weaners of three different body frame sizes (small = 11, medium = 11, and large = 11), representing three different breeds of similar age and body weight groups were obtained from stud breeders. The volumetric water footprint computed were Water Intake Efficiency (WIE), Water Consumption Efficiency (WCE), and Water-Feed-Ratio (WFR). The General Linear Model was used to analyze the data and means were separated using the Fisher LSD test. Pearson moment correlation coefficient was computed to determine the relationship between the volumetric water footprint with carcass and meat quality traits (p<0.05). In large-frame size beef cattle, the WIE was significantly (p<0.05) correlated with protein percentage (r = -0.5960). Whereas insignificantly (p>0.05) correlated with meat color, proximate analyses, and carcass weights. A positive relationship (p<0.05) was observed between WFR and warm (r = 0.641) and cold (r = 0.620) carcass weights. In medium-frame size beef cattle, the WIE was significantly (p<0.05) correlated with warm carcass weight (r = - 0.617) and cold carcass weight (r = 0.620). In small-frame beef cattle, the WIE showed a significant (p<0.05) positive relationship with drip loss (r = 0.710). The WFR was only significantly (p<0.05) correlated with L*(lightness) meat color (r = -0.675). The volumetric water footprint indicators in beef cattle were not correlated to each other in the medium and large-frame size breeds, whereas in the small-frame size breed, the WCE was correlated with the WIE and WFR. Generally, there is a lack of significant associations between the volumetric water footprint indicators in all the beef cattle frame sizes with the majority of carcass and meat quality parameters.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Macamba, T. N., Mpofu, T. J., Nephawe, K. A., Banga, C. B., Ngxumeshe, A. M., Ratsaka, M. M., Munhuweyi, K. & Mtileni, B. (2024). Relationship between Volumetric Water Footprint with Carcass and Meat Quality Characteristics Under Intensive Beef Cattle Production in South Africa. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 19(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2024.315.328
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0
- Issue
- Volume 19, Issue 3
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
