A Conceptual Model for Risk Allocation in the Construction Industry
Chipozya Kosta Tembo-Silungwe1 & Nthatisi Khatleli2 Show affiliations
- Department of Construction Economics and Management, Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia
- School of Construction Economics and Management, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 14, Issue 7, pp. 690–700 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2017.690.700
Abstract
Appropriate risk allocation influences positive project delivery on construction projects while inappropriate allocation results in disputes, quality shortfalls, time and cost overruns. The existing body of knowledge provides guides on how risks should be allocated between the contracting parties. Nevertheless, the full appreciation of risks allocation is rarely given as risk allocation is more than just which party should bear a risk. This study provides a conceptual model of the various ways risks could be allocated. Furthermore, the FIDIC-Redbook (1999), NEC3 (2005/2006) and JCT Major building contract (2005), JBCC (2014), JLC (1972) and open national bidding contract (2013) are used to demonstrate the practicality of the conceptual model. An understanding of risk allocation prerequisites might help to mitigate risks that influence project performance negatively. The use of this conceptualization may help to assign a risk with more than one treatment option to maximize a positive outcome of a negative risk factor.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Tembo-Silungwe, C. K. & Khatleli, N. (2017). A Conceptual Model for Risk Allocation in the Construction Industry. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(7), 690–700. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2017.690.700
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 14, Issue 7
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
