A Comparison between Different Data Mining Algorithms in Freight Mode Choice
Amir Samimi1, Hesamoddin Razi-Ardakani1 & Amir Nohekhan1 Show affiliations
- Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Avenue, Tehran 11365-8639, Iran
American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp. 204–216 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2017.204.216
Abstract
This research aims to study application of support vector machine algorithm, artificial neural networks and five different types of decision trees in predicting mode choice of freight transportation. Performance of these models has been compared with log it model which is one the most prevalent statistical models in the field. Effect of factors such as cargo weight, distance, type and characteristics of commodity has been studied in process of modelling mode choice which is rail and road. In this regard, data gathered in the United States, is used and similarities and advantages of the models are described in details. Results indicated that cost-sensitive support vector machine is the best method in predicting shipment mode choice. After this method, stand C5 decision tree and artificial neural network. The most important variables in determining shipment mode choice of firms are respectively weight, great-circle distance between origin and destination, commodity type, compound impedance factor of rail and truck and containerized condition of the shipment to be moved.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Samimi, A., Razi-Ardakani, H. & Nohekhan, A. (2017). A Comparison between Different Data Mining Algorithms in Freight Mode Choice. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(2), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2017.204.216
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 14, Issue 2
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
