Trust as a Mechanism of Social Regulation the Modern Youth's Behaviour
Svetlana Gurieva1, Maria Borisova1, Olga Mikhalyuk1, Victoria Dmitrieva1, Veronika Odintsova1 & Takeyasu Kawabata2 Show affiliations
- Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- Department of Psychology, Shokei Gakuin University, Japan
American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp. 100–110 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2016.100.110
Abstract
The problem of regulation of social behaviour has been studied of social representations of modern youth. The authors consider that the mechanism of trust can be seen as the basic principle for constructing relations. This article covers issues related to social representations of trust, manifestations of credulity, direction and basic functions of trust. About 380 people have become the subject of the study: 190 men and 190 women aged between 20 and 30 (the average age being 23.78). The study used the following tools: A questionnaire, the authors’ modification of Sachs and Levy’s Sentence Completion Test and the “Trust Situation” projective technique. The data-processing included content analysis, correlation and factor analysis. The results enabled us to create a classification of people based on differences in perception of the trust phenomenon, trust situations, objects and basic functions of trust. The phenomenon of “trust blindness” has been identified and described for the first time.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Gurieva, S., Borisova, M., Mikhalyuk, O., Dmitrieva, V., Odintsova, V. & Kawabata, T. (2016). Trust as a Mechanism of Social Regulation the Modern Youth's Behaviour. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 13(1), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2016.100.110
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 13, Issue 1
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
