Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 2 July 2012

Mathematical Optimum of the Audit Sample

Georgeta Ancuta Span1 & Irimie Emil Popa1

American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 9, Issue 8, pp. 1290–1293 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2012.1290.1293

7,418 accesses4,790 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Problem statement: The primary objective of any audit mission is to obtain a high level of assurance on the fact that financial statements are prepared in accordance with a general financial reporting framework. Getting an absolute level of assurance is not possible due to the complexity and big number of transactions and operations found in practice. This research aims to identify the shortcomings of one of the sampling methods used by the Romania auditors (80/20 method) and it was proposed a mathematical function that leads to more appropriate results. Approach: Two examples were analyzed in order to highlight the importance of the proportion of operations in determining the mathematical optimum. The shortcoming of 80/20 sampling method and the need for a mathematical optimum was shown through a general hypothetical case study. Results: Determining the proportion of small or big operations in an entity`s total transactions is not an arbitrarily decision, it has an optimal value depending on the accepted probability distribution of the operations value. Conclusion: Audit sampling depends on several parameters and has to fit a certain audit budget.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2012 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Span, G. A. & Popa, I. E. (2012). Mathematical Optimum of the Audit Sample. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(8), 1290–1293. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2012.1290.1293

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 9, Issue 8
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Mathematical Optimum of the Audit SampleAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences · Volume 9, Issue 8 · pp. 1290–1293 · © Science PublicationsDownload