Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 31 August 2010

An Experimental Comparison Between Demand Systems of Major Food Groups in Urban Economics

Mahmoud Daneshvar Kakhki1, Naser Shahnoushi1 & Fatemeh Rezapour1

American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 7, Issue 8, pp. 1164–1167 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2010.1164.1167

6,991 accesses5,015 downloads3 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Problem statement: This study examined the eleven major food groups demand for urban areas of Iran during1361-1386. Approach: AIDS, ROTTERDAM, CBS and NBR models was compare together and Sur method was applied for estimating of systems, too. Results: Results of study showed cream and fresh fruits have smallest and largest income elasticity, respectively. Also, cream, bread, dairy, egg, fresh vegetables, oils and fats and sugar and products, are necessary, meat, fresh fruits and dried fruit are luxury and grain is only inferior group, too. The exception meat, dried fruit and sugar and its products, other groups are inelastic than own price changes. Also, among them, grain and dried fruit are most inelastic and most elastic, respectively. That means that demand for them has smallest and largest sensitivity than own price influences. Also, cross price elasticity' s represented that nor of the groups, are gross strictly substitute, together and gross substitute among them is weak. About complement relation, should say fresh fruits and oils and fats are gross strictly complement for cereal and sugar and its products, respectively and gross complement relation among other groups is found weak. Conclusion: AIDS was better than other models and should be apply for analysis of major food group demand for urban areas of Iran, alternatively.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2010 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Kakhki, M. D., Shahnoushi, N. & Rezapour, F. (2010). An Experimental Comparison Between Demand Systems of Major Food Groups in Urban Economics. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(8), 1164–1167. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2010.1164.1167

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 7, Issue 8
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
An Experimental Comparison Between Demand Systems of Major Food Groups in Urban EconomicsAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences · Volume 7, Issue 8 · pp. 1164–1167 · © Science PublicationsDownload