Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 30 June 2008

Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks based on Random Way Point Mobility Model

Geetha Jayakumar & G. Gopinath

American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 5, Issue 6, pp. 659–664 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2008.659.664

7,692 accesses5,181 downloads32 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Ad hoc networks are characterized by multihop wireless connectivity, frequently changing network topology and the need for efficient dynamic routing protocols plays an important role. We compare the performance of two prominent on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks: Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad Hoc On-demand distance Vector Routing (AODV). A detailed simulation model with MAC and physical layer models is used to study the interlayer interactions and their performance implications. We demonstrate that even though DSR and AODV share similar on-demand behavior, the differences in the protocol mechanisms can lead to significant performance differentials. In this paper we examine two on demand routing protocols AODV and DSR based on packet delivery ratio, normalized routing load, normalized MAC load, average end to end delay by varying the number of sources, speed and pause time.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2008 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Jayakumar, G. & Gopinath, G. (2008). Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks based on Random Way Point Mobility Model . American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(6), 659–664. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2008.659.664

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 5, Issue 6
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks based on Random Way Point Mobility ModelAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences · Volume 5, Issue 6 · pp. 659–664 · © Science PublicationsDownload