Sign inSubmit
ArticleArticle metrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 30 April 2008

The Effect of Corner Radii and Part Orientation on Stress Distribution of Cold Forging Die

Ahmad Baharuddin Abdullah, Kam Shwu Ling & Zahurin Samad

American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp. 296–300 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2008.296.300

7,338 accesses5,898 downloads8 citations (Crossref)Journal metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

One of the most critical problems in cold forging is the huge stresses generated from the deformation of metal leads to die failure. The distribution of stresses mainly depends on geometry of the die. An approach to optimal design in cold forging die geometry and orientation are presented in this paper. The impression cold forging dies of the Universal joint was generated using three-dimensional CAD modeling software, SolidWorks. This CAD modeling software coupled with FEA tools, COSM OSWorks. The paper emphasizes on effect of the corner radius and dies orientation on stress distribution.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2008 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Abdullah, A. B., Ling, K. S. & Samad, Z. (2008). The Effect of Corner Radii and Part Orientation on Stress Distribution of Cold Forging Die. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(4), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2008.296.300

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 5, Issue 4
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
The Effect of Corner Radii and Part Orientation on Stress Distribution of Cold Forging DieAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences · Volume 5, Issue 4 · pp. 296–300 · © Science PublicationsDownload