Sign inSubmit
ArticleArticle metrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 28 February 2006

Comparative Study between Various Topological Models of Base Stations in Cellular Mobile Radio Communication

Mohammed F. Alhunaity

American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 1711–1714 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2006.1711.1714

6,876 accesses4,315 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Journal metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the different parameters of quality for the network models of base stations (BS) when the service messages have not a delay. Also, we compare between four topologies star, ring, radial ring and fully connected using identical quality of user service and conditional cost of one Erlang. Our results have been obtained for different probabilities of failure in service message on one branch and fixed number of web channels. The obtained results show that radial ring topology outperform better than the others with respect to both cost and hierarchy.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2006 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Alhunaity, M. F. (2006). Comparative Study between Various Topological Models of Base Stations in Cellular Mobile Radio Communication . American Journal of Applied Sciences, 3(2), 1711–1714. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2006.1711.1714

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 3, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Comparative Study between Various Topological Models of Base Stations in Cellular Mobile Radio CommunicationAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences · Volume 3, Issue 2 · pp. 1711–1714 · © Science PublicationsDownload