Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 30 April 2005

Nelson and Plosser Revisited: Evidence from Fractional ARIMA Models

Guglielmo Maria Caporale1 & Luis A. Gil-Alana1

American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp. 860–872 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2005.860.872

6,715 accesses4,627 downloads1 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

In this study fractionally integrated ARIMA (ARFIMA) models are estimated using an extended version of Nelson and Plosser[1]’s data set. The analysis employs[11]’s maximum likelihood procedure. Such a parametric approach requires the model to be correctly specified in order for the estimates to be consistent. A model-selection procedure based on diagnostic tests on the residuals, together with several likelihood criteria, is adopted to determine the correct specification for each series. The results suggest that all series, except unemployment and bond yields, are integrated of order greater than one. Thus, the standard approach of taking first differences may result in stationary series with long memory behavior.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2005 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Caporale, G. M. & Gil-Alana, L. A. (2005). Nelson and Plosser Revisited: Evidence from Fractional ARIMA Models. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(4), 860–872. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2005.860.872

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 2, Issue 4
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Nelson and Plosser Revisited: Evidence from Fractional ARIMA ModelsAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences · Volume 2, Issue 4 · pp. 860–872 · © Science PublicationsDownload