Sign inSubmit
ArticleArticle metrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 18 December 2005

Irrationality in the Neoclassical Definition of Rationality

Steve Keen1

American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 13, pp. 61–68 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2005.61.68

8,302 accesses4,952 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Journal metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

In this study we are not arguing that competition as it actually occurs in practice is not socially beneficial. Our criticism is directed instead at the false belief that rational profit-maximizing behavior and competition as defined by neoclassical economic theory will lead to a welfare-maximizing outcome-again, as defined by neoclassical theory.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2005 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Keen, S. (2005). Irrationality in the Neoclassical Definition of Rationality. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(13), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2005.61.68

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 2, Issue 13
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Irrationality in the Neoclassical Definition of RationalityAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences · Volume 2, Issue 13 · pp. 61–68 · © Science PublicationsDownload