Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 28 February 2005

An Investigation of the Effect of Aspect Ratio on the Airfoil Performance

M. Kopaç1, M. Yılmaz1 & T. Gültop2

American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 545–549 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2005.545.549

7,682 accesses5,267 downloads5 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

The effect of aspect ratio on the airfoil performance is investigated for airflow about axially symetric wings as a function of the angle of attack. The magnitudes of aerodynamic forces and moments on airfoils resulting from the incompressible viscous flow fields are determined experimentally. The TE54 wind tunnel used for the experiments is an open conduit and has a 300x300 mm x-section with a closed test chamber. The TE81 digital measurement device is used which has three components. Three different types of airfoil profiles are tested under the airflow speed of 33.76 m s-1 and it is concluded that the airfoil with the aspect ratio of 2.761 yields the optimum performance.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2005 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Kopaç, M., Yılmaz, M. & Gültop, T. (2005). An Investigation of the Effect of Aspect Ratio on the Airfoil Performance. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(2), 545–549. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2005.545.549

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 2, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
An Investigation of the Effect of Aspect Ratio on the Airfoil PerformanceAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences · Volume 2, Issue 2 · pp. 545–549 · © Science PublicationsDownload