Sign inSubmit
ArticleArticle metrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 28 February 2005

The Situation and Evaluation of Forest Harvesting Methods in Turkey

Murat Demir1 & Tolga Ozturk1

American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 499–503 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2005.499.503

7,396 accesses4,686 downloads1 citations (Crossref)Journal metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

The present study summarize and evaluate major problems of timber harvesting in Turkey and the future principles and objectives have been defined. Timber harvesting in Turkey is still carried out by manual methods due to economical, social and environmental constraints. Almost 80% of harvesting activities are mechanized in many developed countries while this value is only 5% in Turkey. Overall ratio of mechanization is relatively low. Approximately percentage of man power, animal power, machine power and skyline harvesting are 72, 15, 8 and 5%, respectively. The need for forest roads in total in Turkey was 201810 km and that 133693 km portion on which, corresponding to 66.25% was constructed by end of 2003.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2005 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Demir, M. & Ozturk, T. (2005). The Situation and Evaluation of Forest Harvesting Methods in Turkey. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(2), 499–503. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2005.499.503

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 2, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
The Situation and Evaluation of Forest Harvesting Methods in TurkeyAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences · Volume 2, Issue 2 · pp. 499–503 · © Science PublicationsDownload