Sign inSubmit
ArticleArticle metrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 31 July 2005

A Laboratory Study of Bayesian Updating in Small Feedback-Based Decision Problems

Takemi Fujikawa1 & Sobei H. Oda2

American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 7, pp. 1129–1133 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2005.1129.1133

6,754 accesses4,346 downloads1 citations (Crossref)Journal metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

This study explores small feedback-based decision problems experimentally. Conducted were the experiments in which the decision-maker’s payoff distribution was limited to either favorable distribution or unfavorable distribution. The first remarkable observation revealed complexity/loss aversion in the experiment. The second observation included the law of small numbers. Deviations from maximization were also observed. Finally, we investigated the imperfect Bayesian decision-makers observed in the experiment by exploring to what extent the decision-makers could update subjective Bayesian probability and rely on it in making decisions.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2005 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Fujikawa, T. & Oda, S. H. (2005). A Laboratory Study of Bayesian Updating in Small Feedback-Based Decision Problems. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(7), 1129–1133. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2005.1129.1133

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 2, Issue 7
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
A Laboratory Study of Bayesian Updating in Small Feedback-Based Decision ProblemsAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences · Volume 2, Issue 7 · pp. 1129–1133 · © Science PublicationsDownload