Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 31 March 2008

Waste Management: A Case Study of Ongoing Traditional Practices at East Calcutta Wetland

Shaon Raychaudhuri1, Madhusmita Mishra1, Poulomi Nandy1 & Ashoke R. Thakur1

American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp. 315–320 · doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2008.315.320

8,058 accesses7,189 downloads22 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Calcutta has a unique waste management system which uses the traditional non conventional practice for treating both the solid as well as soluble waste for its 12 million inhabitants . It not only detoxifies the waste but also generates resources for the existing society in form of employment as well as edibles like sufficient vegetable, fish as well as paddy for consumption. The elemental analysis of these products showed no metal toxicity due to their cultivation using waste resource. Thus East Calcutta Wetland can be sited as the best example of integrated resource recovery.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2008 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Raychaudhuri, S., Mishra, M., Nandy, P. & Thakur, A. R. (2008). Waste Management: A Case Study of Ongoing Traditional Practices at East Calcutta Wetland. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 3(1), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2008.315.320

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 3, Issue 1
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Waste Management: A Case Study of Ongoing Traditional Practices at East Calcutta WetlandAmerican Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Volume 3, Issue 1 · pp. 315–320 · © Science PublicationsDownload