Community Based Organic Farming and Social Capital in Different Network Structures: Studies in Two Farming Communities in Bangladesh
M. Hammadur Rahman1 & Masahiro Yamao1 Show affiliations
- Graduate School of Biosphere Science Hiroshima University, Japan
American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 62–68 · doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2007.62.68
Abstract
The main purpose of this study was to assess the status of social capital in different networks of two farming communities (organic and conventional farming) in Tangail district of Bangladesh. Social trust and reciprocity existed in the community were measured in informal, generalized and institutional networks of these two communities. The study was conducted by administering questionnaire survey among the farmers of the two communities. A total of 100 farmers, 50 from each of the organic and conventional farming communities, constituted the sample of the study. To measure social trust and reciprocity in different networks in a community, a self-designed questionnaire was developed to gather needed data. The finding indicated that, there was a statistically significant difference between organic and conventional farmers in regards to trust and reciprocity in generalized and institutional realms of social networks of the both communities. On the other hand, no significant difference was established between the communities in regards to trust and reciprocity in their informal network structure.
Licence and reuse
Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2007 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Rahman, M. H. & Yamao, M. (2007). Community Based Organic Farming and Social Capital in Different Network Structures: Studies in Two Farming Communities in Bangladesh. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 2(2), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2007.62.68
- Licence
- © Science Publications
- Issue
- Volume 2, Issue 2
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
